![]() |
| Overheard on the street: “My dad say I should remarry him” Kodak Tri-x developed 5min. Xtol 1:2 and then 4 min. Xtol 1:2 + Rodinal 1:115 25c |
This is a short update on my original article of adding Rodinal to Xtol. I have been adding Rodinal to Xtol to good effect since 2010.
So why change now? With a purchase of a higher resolution 35mm scanner I’m finding that I want even more control both of the grain and of the compensation in the shadow areas. While I can do it by controlling the ratio of Rodinal to Xtol it becomes a bit tricky to manage all parameters especially when it comes to temperature compensation.
In the last few months through a series of experiments I have come up with this variation on my original method which gives both good results and fine control.
Set up the dilution ratio of Xtol as normal. I try to keep the normal developing times between 7 to no more than 16 minutes. For the last 4 minutes I pour the xtol into a container that has had rodinal added, then pour it back onto the film and then develop the remaining 4 minutes.
![]() |
| Mohawk In Support Of Maggie’s: The Toronto Sex Workers Action Project Same roll as above |
| Still Mine Kodak Kodak TMAX 400 developed: 5min. Xtol 1:1.125 and 4 min. Xtol 1:1.125 + Rodinal 1:115 at 22c |
![]() |
| Fresh Air Fomapan Action 200 developed: 5min. Xtol 1:1.125 and 4 min. Xtol 1:1.125 + Rodinal 1:115 at 20c |
There is a certain modern retro look that I have in my mind for a portrait project I have in the works. The Lomo 120 ISO 100 film AKA Shanghai GP3 looks like a possible film for the project For the developer I would like to use Xtol. Xtol looks good but seem to lack a bit of an edge. Xtol’s primary component is vitamin C and vitamin C is compatible with Rodinal. The idea (from apug) is that a pinch of Rodinal in Xtol adds a bit of edge definition which is normally absent because of the solvent action of the Xtol. So this might be just what is needed.
http://www.unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Rodinal/rodinal.html
http://www.apug.org/forums/viewpost.php?p=959820
It’s a balance between grain and highlights with the Rodinal and shadow detail with the Xtol. The 2 developers just happen to be chemically and PH compatible. But Xtol is a solvent compensating developer while Rodinal is not.
I use around a 2 minute water presoak at the same temperature as the developer and standard agitation (first 30 seconds and a couple of seconds every 2 to 3 minutes thereafter). So far in an unscientific sampling it looks like I’m on the right track. Very happy with the results:
![]() |
| Neopan at 400 souped in xtol 1:1 plus rodinal 1:112 for 9 minutes19c |
![]() |
| Shanghai GP3 developed in Xtol 1:2 + Rodinal 1:112 for 15 minutes at 19c. |
![]() |
| Shanghai GP3 developed in Xtol 1:2 + Rodinal 1:112 for 15 minutes at 19c. |
![]() |
| Shanghai GP3 developed in Xtol 1:2 + Rodinal 1:112 for 14 minutes at 19c. |
![]() |
| Shanghai GP3 in Xtol 1:2 + Rodinal 1:100 for 10 minutes 27c, pushed +1 shot at ISO 160 |
![]() |
| Fomapan Action 400 in Xtol 1:2 + Rodinal 1:100 for 9 minutes 19c |
![]() |
| Fomapan 100 in Xtol 1:2 + Rodinal 1:112 for 9 minutes 20c |
![]() |
| Tri-X 400 at 500 souped in xtol 1:1.7 plus rodinal 1:100 for 9.5 minutes at 23c |
![]() |
||
| Ilford Delta 3200 at ISO 3200 souped in xtol 1:2 plus rodinal 1:100 for 11 minutes at 25c (Pretty smooth for ISO 3200) |