Deblur


Deblurring should not be confused with sharpening. Main cause of blur is out of focus or motion of the camera or the subject. Other causes could be weather such as rain or mist. A debur algorithm attempts to reverse engineer the blurred image. AI image enhancements can look good but it usually replaces blurred features in an image with made-up information, not a good thing if you are trying to read a license plate from a satellite image. In the case of my favorite chicken above notice the slight blemish at the bottom of the eye and the complicated structure around the base of the beak. Standard AI enhancements tend to smooth out these areas making them almost cartoonish (definitely not real-life). Algorithmic deblur image enhancements also have to make assumptions but the transformation is basically mathematic. Modern methods also use AI methods with the object to get a best fit algorithmically rather than nearest fit to an AI database of birds parts (I know an oversimplification). I used this model and only on the head.
New look, Same Old, Same Old

Misty Morning
In 2005 I started my website as an experiment. Twenty-one years later, a generation older, its more than a bit dated! Still an experiment but with some new candy coating. New rraz.ca front page in a static business card style, new WordPress driven blog, I kept all the old posts as many are relevant to film development, so may still be relevant. New fancy slideshow app accessible from photography.rraz.ca or my vibe code navigation tool. Lastly this vibe coded navigation app. When it comes to nonstandard coding AI has a long way to go. Far from perfect but really frustrating try it on your phone or tablet and let me know?
Note On Scanning Black and White Negatives With Epson V500 Using The Individul Gain Setting In Vuescan
![]() |
| With R, G, B gains set as below with the scan imported into Lightroom and using a custom colour profile |
A recent release of Vuescan has new functionality of be able to use individual gain setting:
This allows me make a DNG output scan with each of the RGB channels having different gains.This has been an extension of the single image (hdr) techniques mentioned at the bottom of this introduction to the Epson V500.
Note that depending on the scanner under inspection with the gains being equal one of the RGB channels might be cleaner or have better resolution. One might best use this as the channel with the middle gain.
![]() |
||||
|
Same as above plus color has been flattened back to Black and White
Mamiya C220 80mm f2.8 TMAX 400 Film D76 1:1 10 minutes 22c |
Redscale and Double Exposures as Normal / Redscale Pairs
![]() |
| Cross Processed Expired Kodak Ektachrome 360T Redscale Shot at Iso 100 |
So You Have Just Brought A New Camera – Health Care For The Undead
So you have just brought a new camera, consider it as a wake up call that we are mostly mindless consumers of things that we are made to think we need or should desire to own. With the commercialization of social media the brainwashing is almost complete. This is neither a good or bad thing it’s just the reality as it is now.
So you have your: {first; new; cheap; free; expensive; fantastic;shiny; retro… cell; film; consumer; dslr; rangefinder; pro; (2/3rds, c, full frame) and/or …} camera so what now? Each one of those cameras as sure as you breath is capable of taking a picture that in the right hands could be a masterpiece.
Now that this new camera is in your hands it’s time to stop for at least a short while being a mindless consumer of photography goods and services and instead learn to take better photographs! To that aim if you haven’t already you may want to evaluate or re-evaluate what your own development goals are and alter your current path to a direction that might result in you achieving those goals.
If it turns out that you just want a shiny new toy then that’s OK. But if you don’t use your brain to effect changes in the way you take photographs then you shouldn’t expect any changes in the results.
Hansa 135mm f3.2 Lens
I have this Hansa 135mm f3.2 lens. Made in Japan it came with an adapter to fit on my Nikon. I bought it for a few dollars attached to a Nikor closeup bellows. Not a bad little performer. Notice the 2 rings at the top. Those are for “stop down metering”. I suspect one should lock so you can preset aperture and then open up for focusing but doesn’t lock. The lightly coated optics are very clean and clear. With a 16 or 17 rounded aperture blades should mean nice out of focus highlights.
The origin of the lens is veiled in the mists of time. Some say they were made for Hansa Japan rebranded from another still to be determined Japanese lens manufacture maybe Cosina. Others say it might be a house brand for Hansa Foto in Cologne. Another even remoter idea is that it was a Nikkor lens made for Hanson Canon imported into the USA under the Hansa name.
Once you get use to the stop down aperture control it is a nice little performer.
Cellphonography Love/Hate Relationship
The things I hate about my cell phone camera:
- Poor Optics
- Glare
- Poor image quality
- Many too many Pixels for the resolution
- Shutter,Timing and Focus Uncertainty: STFU and take the shot now!
- Results only look good if printed small
- Fixed wide angle view of the world
- No bokeh
- Strange motion artifacts
- Weird HDTV aspect ratio
- The awkward ergonomics for photography
- The tacky fake special effects and instant post processing
- Instant posting of images many which I will regret in the morning
The things I love about my cell phone camera
All of the above!
A Note On Long Exposures, Reciprocity Failure For Kodak Ektar And City Night Shooting
![]() |
| Kodak Ektar |
City Streets At Night
Reciprocity
Without going into the The Gurney-Mott Theory or subsequent rewrites the standard characteristic curves can be used to accurately predict how much compensation is needed for what part of the image. Of course you have to do conversions to put it in terms that you can use it on the different zones of your image.. When you do long exposures you are effectively working in the lower part of the curve how much of the image and by how much depends on where each zone lies on the curve and where you want it to end up in terms of density.
Reciprocity Failure For Ektar (1)
metered time — adjusted time
1 —————– 1.4
2 —————– 2.9
4 —————– 6.3
8 —————– 14.1
15 —————– 29.7
30 —————– 68.4
60 —————– 159.0
90 —————– 261.2
120 —————– 371.7
240 —————– 871.5
![]() |
| Toronto Nights Old Style 10 second exposure at f11 in a 1953 Kodak Retina IIa Efke KB21 Expired April 1977 |

















































